📌 Appears in:
Plain English Summary
What if the best evidence for life after death could be explained by the living having incredibly powerful psychic abilities? That's philosopher Stephen Braude's provocative argument here. He challenged researchers who claimed phenomena like people suddenly speaking foreign languages they'd never learned ("xenoglossy") proved past lives. His core point: we simply don't know how far psychic abilities might stretch, so maybe living people are unconsciously pulling off these feats themselves. He examined fascinating cases -- child prodigies, a mysterious literary persona called Patience Worth, and dissociative conditions -- arguing human abilities are far stranger than assumed. Important enough to spark a published debate with Ian Stevenson in the same journal issue.
Actual Paper Abstract
Even the most sophisticated discussions of the evidence for survival underestimate the conceptual difficulties facing the survival hypothesis. Perhaps the major challenge is posed by the rival "super-psi" hypothesis, which most writers fail to confront in its most plausible and potent form. Once the super-psi hypothesis is taken seriously, two major weaknesses in discussions of survival stand out clearly. First, analyses of apparently anomalous knowledge that tend to be fatally superficial in their treatment of subject psychodynamics. And second, analyses of apparently anomalous abilities and skills trade on an impoverished and naive conception of the nature of human abilities.
Research Notes
Landmark philosophical analysis that reframed the survival-vs-super-psi debate by arguing we have no grounds for limiting the scope of psi among the living. Directly challenges Stevenson's xenoglossy work. Foundational reference in the mediumship and survival controversy (#7), cited by Kelly (2010) and Delorme et al. (2021).
Argues that even the most sophisticated discussions of survival evidence underestimate the conceptual difficulties posed by the rival 'super-psi' hypothesis. Two major weaknesses in survival arguments are identified: superficial treatment of subject psychodynamics when analyzing anomalous propositional knowledge, and naive conceptions of human abilities when analyzing anomalous skills. Cases examined include Eisenbud's depth-psychological analysis of the Cagliostro persona, Stevenson's Sharada/Uttara xenoglossy case, the Patience Worth literary productions, and evidence from child prodigies and dissociation. Published alongside Stevenson's formal reply and Braude's counter-reply in the same issue of JSE (Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 127-155).
Related Papers
Companion
More in Mediumship
Intuitive Assessment of Mortality Based on Facial Characteristics: Behavioral, Electrocortical, and Machine Learning Analyses
A Mixed Methods Phenomenological and Exploratory Study of Channeling
People Reporting Experiences of Mediumship Have Higher Dissociation Symptom Scores Than Non-Mediums, But Below Thresholds for Pathological Dissociation
Neuroimaging during Trance State: A Contribution to the Study of Dissociation
Anomalous Information Reception by Research Mediums Demonstrated Using a Novel Triple-Blind Protocol
📋 Cite this paper
Braude, Stephen E (1992). Survival or Super-psi?. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
@article{braude_1992_survival,
title = {Survival or Super-psi?},
author = {Braude, Stephen E},
year = {1992},
journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}